5-cycle program analysis (C8–C12) · Concord CSAP collision data (2020–2025) · Cycle 13 strategy
▶ Cycle 13 Planning Mode
Collision data live · 2,108 records
HSIP: 1,281 projects · $1.15B · C8–C12
HSIP All-Time Won
$24.1M
Statewide Rank · #5 all-time
↑ C9 #23 → C12 #4 of 153
Total Collisions
2,108
Concord · 2020–2025
24 killed · 2,767 injured
VRU Crashes (Ped+Bike)
390
219 ped · 171 bike · 18.5%
10 killed · 368 injured
Night-Time Crashes
558
26.5% of all · 15 fatal at night
38 crashes: dark, no lights
C13 Portfolio Target
$10–15M
1 BCR anchor + 2 BCR + 4 set-asides
⭐ Top 3 finish achievable
Untapped CM Gaps
5
High-value, crash-confirmed + never applied
Signs + Signal Hardware now saturated
Funding TrajectoryCycles 8–12
C8
CYCLE 8
—
Not funded
$2.4M
CYCLE 9
$2.39M
#23 / 142
$3.7M
CYCLE 10
$3.67M
#15 / 154
$7.9M
CYCLE 11
$7.91M
#3 / 159
$8.9M
CYCLE 12
$8.85M
#4 / 153
All Funded Projects10 projects · $24.1M
Countermeasure Coverage MatrixWhat's been done vs. what remains for C13
Infrastructure Coverage EstimatesBased on cumulative HSIP applications C9–C12
Concord CSAP 2020–2025 · 2,108 collision records. Crash pools are matched to HSIP countermeasure categories using CHP SWITRS classification (collision type, control device, lighting, PCF violation). This data drives the Gap Analysis and C13 win-score calculations.
Annual Trend
■ Total■ Pedestrian■ Bicycle■ Night
Collision Type Breakdown
Top Crash Hotspots2020–2025 · all modes
Pedestrian Hotspots
Bicycle HotspotsCrashes +59% since 2020
Corridor Summary
Sparklines show statewide project count C8→C12. Last bar (bright blue) = C12. Crash count = Concord collisions in this CM's addressable pool (2020–2025). Avg grant = C12 program-wide average for that CM.
· 🚀 Surging = statewide adoption growing fast (slope >2 projects/cycle) — strong competition but validates BCR; Caltrans is actively funding this CM and reviewers are familiar with it.
· ↓ Declining = statewide adoption falling (slope <−1) — lower competition but may signal reviewer fatigue, eligibility changes, or saturation; apply with caution and pair with stronger CMs.
· → Stable = consistent statewide use; predictable competition and well-understood BCR methodology.
↓ Declining CMsStatewide adoption falling — lower competition but apply with caution; pair with stronger CMs
Red = Concord has never applied. Amber = applied but not recently. Each card shows the addressable crash pool from 2020–2025 Concord collision data, validating why this gap matters and quantifying the BCR evidence available for a C13 application.
Rankings synthesize Concord's 5-cycle HSIP history + 2020–2025 Concord collision data + C8–C12 program-wide trends. Amber chips show the specific crash evidence pool available for each project's BCR calculation. Portfolio total: $10.4–15.5M.
Top Countermeasures by Recent Funding (C11+C12) with Concord Crash Context
BCR Average Grant by Cycle
C12 Category Mix
Strategic Intelligence Notes
Concord's SS4A Position
Current Status
HSIP vs SS4A — What Each Funds
FY25 Award Intelligence521 total · 67 implementation · $982M
Implementation Grant Benchmarks
What Winning Projects Include (67 impl grants)
Concord SS4A RecommendationsTwo-cycle strategy — Planning first, then Implementation
California Implementation Winners — FY25
Funding Portfolio by Category — Hover to explore
$42.8M
Total Funded All Sources
Grand Total — All Funded Sources (2017–2024)
$42.8M
Update Grant Intelligence
Upload collision data or manually edit grant project figures.
📂
Drop collision CSV/Excel here
No file selected
Expected columns (flexible matching): Date · Location/Address · Collision Type · Injuries/Fatalities Source: TIMS, SWITRS export, or Concord CSAP